Registered Members Login:
   
Forgotten Your Details? Click Here To Recover +
Welcome To The ShareCafe Community - Talk Shares And Take Stock With Smart Investors - New Here? Click To Register >

86 Pages (Click to Jump) V  « < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > »    
 
  
Reply to this topic

COVID-19, Pandemic
henrietta
post Posted: Jun 3 2021, 08:26 AM
  Quote Post


Posts: 4,525
Thanks: 743


In Reply To: mullokintyre's post @ Jun 1 2021, 11:24 PM

Sharescene back on again. Covid still here. Victoria still struggling. Chins still huffing and puffing.
Go back to sleep.

Cheers
J



--------------------
"Sometimes I sits and thinks, and sometimes I just sits." Satchel Paige

"No road is long with good company." Traditional
 
mullokintyre
post Posted: Jun 1 2021, 11:24 PM
  Quote Post


Posts: 3,343
Thanks: 1176


From the country that brought you Corona 19, comes a new gift, a new strain of bird flu that has passed to humans.
From AP News
What may prove to be the first case of the H10N3 strain of bird flu passing to a human has been detected in China, reports said Tuesday, as local health authorities assured the world the risk of large-scale spread is “low.”

Hmm, not sure if the rest of the world is going to take their assurances all that seriously these days.
Mick




--------------------
sent from my Olivetti Typewriter.
 
plastic
post Posted: May 30 2021, 09:08 PM
  Quote Post


Posts: 11,041
Thanks: 316


If by the Fourth of July, America declares victory over the virus while there is a resurgence in the rest of the world and a mega pharma deal goes down at the same time involving Merck and/or GSK and/or Sanofi with ALNY in the middle of it all, we will know for sure this thing was a racket from the very start. The underlying premise that Covid is a bioengineered weapon released upon an unsuspecting population the same way the A-bomb was for the same purpose. To see what it does.



--------------------
What did Uncle Mel do to us?
 
mullokintyre
post Posted: May 30 2021, 06:57 PM
  Quote Post


Posts: 3,343
Thanks: 1176


In Reply To: mullokintyre's post @ May 29 2021, 11:01 AM

As a sort of addendum to my post below, it should be pointed out that Peter Daszak was for some strange reason, one of the senior "experts" who made up the WHO investigative team that went to China to conduct its investigation into the origins of the virus. Conflict of interest? Move on, nothing to see here.
Mick



--------------------
sent from my Olivetti Typewriter.
 
mullokintyre
post Posted: May 29 2021, 11:01 AM
  Quote Post


Posts: 3,343
Thanks: 1176


It seems that the MSM media have suddenly taken on board the view that the whole "the virus escaped from a Wuhan Lab" thing may just have some credence. More than a few people are saying that those same MSM inhabitants were guilty of trump Derangement Syndrome. Namely, that because Trump said it, it must be wrong and we must all agree. Thus anyone who spoke in favour of it was part of the conspiracy theory lunatic fringe. There may be some measure of truth in that , but it would seem that the real reasons are the usual ones. Self interest. Someone covering up because their arse and livlihood were on the line.

For those of you who have sufficient intellect to understand mildly complex biological articles, the article by Nicholas Wade, a science writer, on the origins of Covid 19 make some interesting reading.
Its long, some sections require rereading to get the hang of it (at least it did for me), but takes away a lot of the emotive language that seems to get bandies about.
from Nicholas Wade

Here is one of the passages that support why the original idea was suppressed. Plain old self interest.
QUOTE
From early on, public and media perceptions were shaped in favor of the natural emergence scenario by strong statements from two scientific groups. These statements were not at first examined as critically as they should have been.
“We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin,” a group of virologists and others wrote in the Lancet on February 19, 2020, when it was really far too soon for anyone to be sure what had happened. Scientists “overwhelmingly conclude that this coronavirus originated in wildlife,” they said, with a stirring rallying call for readers to stand with Chinese colleagues on the frontline of fighting the disease.
Contrary to the letter writers’ assertion, the idea that the virus might have escaped from a lab invoked accident, not conspiracy. It surely needed to be explored, not rejected out of hand. A defining mark of good scientists is that they go to great pains to distinguish between what they know and what they don’t know. By this criterion, the signatories of the Lancet letter were behaving as poor scientists: they were assuring the public of facts they could not know for sure were true.
It later turned out that the Lancet letter had been organized and drafted by Peter Daszak, president of the EcoHealth Alliance of New York. Dr. Daszak’s organization funded coronavirus research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. If the SARS2 virus had indeed escaped from research he funded, Dr. Daszak would be potentially culpable. This acute conflict of interest was not declared to the Lancet’s readers. To the contrary, the letter concluded, “We declare no competing interests.”

Daszak is connected to Fauci in the under the table promotion of the so called gain of function research. He may yet be Fauci's achilles heel. It also is a black mark against The Lancet, once considered the epitome of unbiased scientific and medical research.

There is a much longer and more technical section on the letter from Nature medcine from a group of Virologists. This was not a technical article, so did not provide any research, just opinion. Wade takes this to task for some poor scientific statements.


These two articles were widely quoted in the MSM as they collectively joined the conspiracy bandwagon. Wade points out that most large MSM orgs have science writers with science quals like himself, but they either did not ask, or chose to ignore the the obvious questions about this second letter.

It highlights the group think that has pervaded so many of our organisations, but what is worse, is the systematic and deliberate cancelling, bullying, ostracising and harrassing of any one who questions the consensus. Who cares if its right or wrong, its the consensus.

Mick



--------------------
sent from my Olivetti Typewriter.

Said 'Thanks' for this post: henrietta  Pendragon  
 
plastic
post Posted: May 28 2021, 07:42 PM
  Quote Post


Posts: 11,041
Thanks: 316


Try the phone.



--------------------
What did Uncle Mel do to us?
 


henrietta
post Posted: May 28 2021, 06:28 PM
  Quote Post


Posts: 4,525
Thanks: 743


In Reply To: plastic's post @ May 28 2021, 05:34 PM

Every which way I can on the net.

Cheers
J



--------------------
"Sometimes I sits and thinks, and sometimes I just sits." Satchel Paige

"No road is long with good company." Traditional
 
plastic
post Posted: May 28 2021, 05:34 PM
  Quote Post


Posts: 11,041
Thanks: 316


In Reply To: henrietta's post @ May 21 2021, 06:54 PM

Which ways have you asked?



--------------------
What did Uncle Mel do to us?
 
plastic
post Posted: May 28 2021, 05:27 PM
  Quote Post


Posts: 11,041
Thanks: 316


Hey Mully, I sincerely hope you, your wife and daughter did not get the AZ vaccine. If you did, you may well have dodged a bullet...for now.

This poor girl did the right thing. Corporate employer demands it, employee abides, gotta pay for the mortgage and kids etc. Now she's dead.

As far as I know, Australia is still pushing the AZ vaccine.

What would you rather have, the vaccine or the disease?

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-tyne-57267169



--------------------
What did Uncle Mel do to us?
 
plastic
post Posted: May 21 2021, 07:11 PM
  Quote Post


Posts: 11,041
Thanks: 316


In Reply To: henrietta's post @ May 21 2021, 06:54 PM

Neither Jacinda nor Bloomfield have been vaccinated.

Now, don't you wonder why not?

I do.

She has said she could not live with her conscience if she jumped the queue ahead of those more deserving in the lower socio-economic zones or front line staff. Instead she will wait until the mass roll out starts in July. However, I have also read, vaccine supplies will be critically low at the end of June and the necessary infrastructure is well behind its build schedule.

Sounds like a good excuse.

Meanwhile, the most efficacious vaccine of them all, Novavax', is denied by the regulators and authorities because of political might.



--------------------
What did Uncle Mel do to us?
 
 


86 Pages (Click to Jump) V  « < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > » 

Back To Top Of Page
Reply to this topic


You agree through the use of ShareCafe, that you understand and accept the TERMS OF USE.


TERMS OF USE  -  CONTACT ADMIN  -  ADVERTISING