Registered Members Login:
   
Forgotten Your Details? Click Here To Recover +
Welcome To The ShareCafe Community - Talk Shares And Take Stock With Smart Investors - New Here? Click To Register >

5138 Pages (Click to Jump) V  < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > »    
 
  
Reply to this topic

CUV, CLINUVEL PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED
investek
post Posted: Mar 20 2021, 03:40 PM
  Quote Post


Posts: 340
Thanks: 1266


Hi Waz,

Just wanted to say I’m missing your contributions to the CUV forum, would be great to see you on sharetease.com, or hotcopper or just back here.

Cheers,
Investek

PS - check PMs


Said 'Thanks' for this post: waz  Sherlock1123  Farleap11  
 
Dr Wally
post Posted: Mar 19 2021, 04:38 PM
  Quote Post


Posts: 746
Thanks: 782



“Something seems to be brewing.”

This super safe, cancer preventing, skin tanning drug was developed in the 80 FFS.

Billy would have been a spritely 40 something at the time if my math is correct?

Its now quarter way into 2021 and 18months post momentous FDA (forced through decades of A1 safety and locked down through malice) decision, so if not now, when???

Every day that passes just proves the safety of Scenesse and the stupidity of those that remain in the way and in denial of the drug further.

The only company in the history of the world attempting to commercialise a product that western governments rhetoric says “there’s no such thing” and is not safe.

At to the stupidity and strangeness the CEO agreed many many years ago that it couldn’t be proved that constant sunburn injury led to skin cancer hence the glacial pace, resistance, stonewalling enigmatic saga that has ensued ever since.

As safe and effective as this game changing drug is and as good as the future is looking right now (has looked for the past 2 decades) one can never be too sure with this company. 🤓



--------------------
Whomever said that sunburn WASNT linked directly to the formation of skin cancer was a fool and a complete fraud. This first class fraud has set back Clinuvels photo protective skin tanning drug a good decade and helped significantly the toxic suncream industry continue to thrive and further perpetrate this outdated deadly lie for profit.

The truth will be revealed one day soon won’t it PW??

2020. Year of the germ!
 
Dr Wally
post Posted: Mar 16 2021, 12:50 PM
  Quote Post


Posts: 746
Thanks: 782


This CEO has volumes of truely undeniable data to turn this sunlight demonising space (ideology) on its head but he’s simply still too scared to rock the boat, it seems?

What other reason could there be?

It’s 2021 Pier, you’ve promised so much for way too long. Please get off of your A and get our story out there to enlighten our confused and diseased society that sunlight is not their enemy and that “there really IS such a thing as a SAFE SCENESSE TAN”.


Some say this super safe and effective drug should have been widely available at least 5 years ago but they don’t appreciate that you’ve worked yourself to the bone and you’ve done all you could of course so maybe they’re just misguided or simply frustrated but either way (not trying to scare you) more
“black swans” are circling above Pier.

Maybe they’re our friends?? 😬

Surely it’s a priority of yours in 2021 to have this company and it’s safe photo protective skin cancer preventing skin tanning drug widely known and understood by all??

Quick question if I may?

With Scenesse locked down into “special centres” for 10 years is it even slightly possible that these skin tan hating toxic suncream loving regulators will allow systemically acting Afamelanotide “cosmetic” cream to become a reality or will this “Clinuvel cosmetic” truely be some half assed, laughable, embarrassment of a cosmetic ??

Surely not!!

Just about everything surrounding Clinuvel (other than the drug thank F) is strange and concerning and confusing and has forever been causing a great amount of uncertainty. Cmon Pw, be straight for one moment with your long standing and loyal buddy’s.

Your continued silence here only helps these manipulative shorters. You do understand this right??

Luv u!! 🤓



--------------------
Whomever said that sunburn WASNT linked directly to the formation of skin cancer was a fool and a complete fraud. This first class fraud has set back Clinuvels photo protective skin tanning drug a good decade and helped significantly the toxic suncream industry continue to thrive and further perpetrate this outdated deadly lie for profit.

The truth will be revealed one day soon won’t it PW??

2020. Year of the germ!
 
paul jackson
post Posted: Mar 14 2021, 11:01 AM
  Quote Post


Posts: 179
Thanks: 287


When someone on another forum said he was going to sell CUV, the resident smarta$$ said, "May I suggest you buy some Gamestop?" - which
garnered plenty of laughs.

Maybe the smarta$$ should have taken his own flippant advice. It's been a 7-bagger again off its lows since that post.

Not to compare the two stocks or companies or suggesting others sell CUV...but, just goes to show.

Meanwhile, how many boxes has Clinuvel ticked for all the things they were going to do in Q1 this year?

What about that other indication the Frenchman said was going to be mentioned in December?

Hard to have good marketing and build credibility with investors when this kind of stuff continues.

Buy hey - about time for another 6-page newsletter. It's my go-to source for reading about the world economy.

 
macgyver
post Posted: Mar 9 2021, 11:23 AM
  Quote Post


Posts: 920
Thanks: 915


In Reply To: Dr Wally's post @ Mar 8 2021, 01:07 AM

This is already posted to ST, I thought it prudent to post here for fellow shareholders and hopefully we will get a confirmation from Clinuvel shortly.
This trial ticks all the boxes regarding eligible patients, type of drug, duration of the trial, location of the insult (M2 and above) and Professor Rosenfeld’s association with Monash University Dept of Neuroscience.

The following is from the Monash University Projects page:

A Proof of Concept, Phase IIa, Open Label Study to Evaluate the Safety of Afamelanotide in Patients with acute Arterial Ischaemic Stroke (AIS) due to Distal [M2 segment and beyond] Arterial Large Vessel Occlusion (LVO) or Perforator Occlusion and who are ineligible for Intravenous Thrombolysis (IVT) or Endovascular Thrombectomy (EVT).

Start date: 10/12/20 Finish date: 31/12/22

Monash University Projects


Said 'Thanks' for this post: Dr Wally  
 
Dr Wally
post Posted: Mar 8 2021, 01:07 AM
  Quote Post


Posts: 746
Thanks: 782


In Reply To: Sparkeysf's post @ Mar 6 2021, 04:18 PM

No, I completely missed that one Sparkey.

Oh well the CEO offloading a small parcel (100,000) at this point in time shouldn’t really affect CUV share price..... right? weirdsmiley.gif

Ive got a funny feeling that CUV might get pumped in a southerly direction today possibly sub 20$.

WTF!! Here I am predicting CUV SP @2am like some Idioto Yahoo!!

I tell you one thing: I can’t wait for the Clinuvel movie to appear or will it be some kind of dramatic miniseries for Netflix?

The woke PW can bask in the glory of going into battle for equal opportunity in the boardroom, office and lab while wasting a good decade attempting to appease the “no such thing as a safe tan” sunlight demonising zeitgeist.

One day these morons will be recommending Scenesse for photo protection ultimate you know!



--------------------
Whomever said that sunburn WASNT linked directly to the formation of skin cancer was a fool and a complete fraud. This first class fraud has set back Clinuvels photo protective skin tanning drug a good decade and helped significantly the toxic suncream industry continue to thrive and further perpetrate this outdated deadly lie for profit.

The truth will be revealed one day soon won’t it PW??

2020. Year of the germ!
 


Sparkeysf
post Posted: Mar 6 2021, 04:18 PM
  Quote Post


Posts: 1


Did anyone catch the announcement that PW sold 104k shares a few days ago? I'm looking at all the past ASX announcements in my inbox since 2011, and can't find any stating he's sold any until now. Maybe it's nothing, and he just needs funds to buy a new condo, or vintage Aston Martin... lol. And, it is only 2.9% of his total holdings. But, it still makes me wonder.

 
Ozdronetech
post Posted: Mar 4 2021, 12:50 PM
  Quote Post


Posts: 59
Thanks: 16


In Reply To: Ozdronetech's post @ Mar 4 2021, 12:32 PM


Doh! laugh.gif



--------------------
If a treeeeeeeeee falls in the forest!!!
 
Ozdronetech
post Posted: Mar 4 2021, 12:50 PM
  Quote Post


Posts: 59
Thanks: 16


In Reply To: Ozdronetech's post @ Mar 4 2021, 12:32 PM


7 years floundering in EU to see 10-20% of EPP patients treated is a disgrace and was one of the reasons why many (potential) investors thought US rollout would be similar so were not all that keen to invest.




--------------------
If a treeeeeeeeee falls in the forest!!!
 
Ozdronetech
post Posted: Mar 4 2021, 12:32 PM
  Quote Post


Posts: 59
Thanks: 16


In Reply To: oystercatcher's post @ Mar 3 2021, 10:55 PM

I’d like to say absolute BS so I’ll just come out and say it: absolute Bull Shit!

“The negative posters are either the 1% or hired to do their bidding. “

What the 1% of those that actually comprehend the situation?

Your sounding like one of those paranoid guys that can’t handle a different opinion but constantly and idiotically post SP predictions or confuse melanin with melatonin.


Does your logic apply to negative posts from those @ sharetease also?

or do you only have the minimal courage to single me out?

Have you questioned their motives for being negative recently?

“This stock will take off. “

Really!!

So if we use your logic it would be fair to ask: are you pumping this stock?? and do you have a vested interest for saying what you say? or are you being paid?

Wake up!

“The posts before this one is all about seeding doubt. “

No that’s completely inaccurate.

If you knew anything about what I post you’d understand that I 1000% believe in the drug and have always stated so.

I know personally (first hand and through scores of others) of its potent photo protective power to safely stimulate a safe and incredibly effective skin tan and have been living with the benefits since 2005 and have been saying this for over ten years online.

This lazy?? management, on the other hand gave in to the fraud of anti sunlight and skin tan zealots (admittedly powerful and influential) fearing that it would only make things more difficult and lengthy for them if they didn’t bow down and shut up taliking about widespread availability for photo protective skin tanning.

History lesson.

The FDA rejected this drug multiple times (not on any grounds of even potential negative safety but SOLEY because of their fraudulent “fear of skin tanning abuse”.

They were forced to try their luck in the EU because the ignorance and denial of the drug was so intense at the time.

Why would such a super safe drug still (after decades of stunning proof) still suffer from regulatory resistance and stonewalling??

Sure FDA and others have approved the drug but after maxing out regulatory timeframes they had no other option but to approve BUT they forced the safe drug to be locked down into “special centres” for approximately 10 years.

Why would it be necessary for a proven long term safe drug to have to suffer from such draconian measures??

Should the world fear “tanning abuse” OR has it always been the TOXIC SUNCREAM industry (and their powerful friends) fearing this so called tanning abuse???

The drug will no doubt make it to the top (one day) I’m just filthy that drug regulators , toxic suncream industry and lame (sitting back comfortable) management have all failed the drug and the community that continue suffering through this “skin cancer epidemic” with no viable option for photo protection other than TOXIC disease promoting suncreams.

Scandalous!! Bring on the movie!!



--------------------
If a treeeeeeeeee falls in the forest!!!
 
 


5138 Pages (Click to Jump) V  < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > » 

Back To Top Of Page
Reply to this topic


You agree through the use of ShareCafe, that you understand and accept the TERMS OF USE.


TERMS OF USE  -  CONTACT ADMIN  -  ADVERTISING