Registered Members Login:
   
Forgotten Your Details? Click Here To Recover +
Welcome To The ShareCafe Community - Talk Shares And Take Stock With Smart Investors - New Here? Click To Register >

5138 Pages (Click to Jump) V  < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > »    
 
  
Reply to this topic

CUV, CLINUVEL PHARMACEUTICALS LIMITED
macgyver
post Posted: Apr 19 2021, 09:03 AM
  Quote Post


Posts: 920
Thanks: 915


In Reply To: oystercatcher's post @ Apr 18 2021, 01:55 PM

I been reading your’s and Zodiac1’s comments from afar and I’m of the opinion you’re not genuine posters. What’s clear is that there is no better site with deep dive research and nor a more loyal following of Clinuvel than ST. I don’t see any deep research going on here, but you’re sure as hell going to other forums to look at their research. No question. I have to assume you’re working for this site or are stooges for someone else. There’s next to no comments you guys make that doesn’t involve bagging people elsewhere. Stay focussed on the company.


Said 'Thanks' for this post: Sherlock1123  
 
oystercatcher
post Posted: Apr 18 2021, 01:55 PM
  Quote Post


Posts: 95
Thanks: 84


In Reply To: Zodiac1's post @ Apr 18 2021, 01:43 PM

Thanks for the link. Fantastic video and very good inspiring. 19 years long and have always been happy with this investment. Can’t wait to see how “other posters” try to knock this video. Thanks again


Said 'Thanks' for this post: Zodiac1  
 
Zodiac1
post Posted: Apr 18 2021, 01:43 PM
  Quote Post


Posts: 123
Thanks: 170


Wow, the intro video to the strategic update is amazing, i've watched it several times. I think it really displays the significance of what they have achieved so far and the fact the journey is not over yet very well, evokes an emotional response, powerful. So excited to see this progressing, for the patients, for the company and for all of us long term investors who kept the faith all these years. biggrin.gif

Strategic Update II



--------------------
"CLINUVEL is a leader in the field of photomedicine, investigating the interaction of light and human biology and pioneering the concept of medicinal photoprotection."

Said 'Thanks' for this post: nipper  Ray Cokes  Lisa0825  
 
oystercatcher
post Posted: Apr 17 2021, 08:06 AM
  Quote Post


Posts: 95
Thanks: 84


Great article, a must read. Search on Google using the article title below.

Get shorty: how Clinuvel Pharmaceuticals beat the hedgies


Said 'Thanks' for this post: Zodiac1  Lisa0825  
 
Boat2float
post Posted: Apr 12 2021, 09:32 PM
  Quote Post


Posts: 82
Thanks: 60


Did you notice the cut over with the NASDAQ book sitting on W’s desk? Hmm

 
paul jackson
post Posted: Apr 2 2021, 12:30 AM
  Quote Post


Posts: 179
Thanks: 287


People are cheering all the communiques, webinars, strategic updates, etc? Seriously?

To me, it's cover to appease the shareholders. Don't pay any attention to all the Q1 deadlines
they already missed - trials they listed at the last AGM timelines that didn't start on time, the new indication
that Wolgen said last November he would tell us about in December that still has not been mentioned.

And pay no attention to the fact that bringing the manufacturing in house will almost assuredly
push back the OTC product timelines.

If you think they will release the first OTC product this year as they said repeatedly, you're gullible.

Madman & Johnny Tech are two of the few that see what's really going on and call out the BS.

2021 - same old crapola. Missed deadlines, and numerous delays.

But hey, the communiques are getting longer, and another exciting script-reading webinar may come soon.

 


Dr Wally
post Posted: Mar 31 2021, 01:23 PM
  Quote Post


Posts: 746
Thanks: 782





To deny someone with the life expectancy of just a few short decades, a super safe and proven photo protective drug that could potentially cure them from such a horrible disease and existence where they have zero hope and zero options takes a special type of logic, empathy and compassion: none!


Scenesse safety has always shown A1 profile and has never been suspected of anything even mildly serious at any level, which just goes to prove that the ethics evaluation used to deny such a trial for these utterly vulnerable and suffering people was based purely on fraudulent self serving grounds.

Hopefully this corrupt period of Clinuvels history can be examined in great detail in the the up coming movie so that some of the orchestrators of this costly and deadly scandal can be called out and shamed: at a minimum.



--------------------
Whomever said that sunburn WASNT linked directly to the formation of skin cancer was a fool and a complete fraud. This first class fraud has set back Clinuvels photo protective skin tanning drug a good decade and helped significantly the toxic suncream industry continue to thrive and further perpetrate this outdated deadly lie for profit.

The truth will be revealed one day soon won’t it PW??

2020. Year of the germ!
 
Dr Wally
post Posted: Mar 22 2021, 11:54 PM
  Quote Post


Posts: 746
Thanks: 782


https://ar.iiarjournals.org/content/40/1/501

This is but one issue in the sunlight and skin tanning space that has significantly affected Clinuvels progress.

Sunbed usage really is the perfect example where emotion and irrational bias (through decades of falsehoods being stated by trustworthy?? authorities has ruled and been at the heart of the issue rather than scientific data and real evidence.


“The gap between sunbed studies and earlier studies on risk of sun exposure remains remarkable. “

Confounding caused by exposure to the sun – the major UV source – is often neglected or corrected for inadequately. Most often, such work lacks a proper analysis of covariance (collinearity or other) to eliminate a possible dominance of sun over sunbed exposure due to an a priori highly plausible strong correlation between sunbed use and sunbathing; OR=2 to 7 for sunbathing among sunbed users versus nonusers (12-14).

As pointed out in a recent French study (15), sunbeds were estimated to have only a minor contribution to melanoma incidence (1.5% in men and 4.6% in women) compared with the sun (83%); that is, sunbeds were not likely to be a major driver of the increase in melanoma incidence.

Moreover, the authors noted that disentangling risk from use of sunbeds from that of the sun is difficult [anecdotal attribution of melanoma to sunbed use is often offset by excessive sunbathing, as exemplified by an Australian publicity campaign to regulate solaria



--------------------
Whomever said that sunburn WASNT linked directly to the formation of skin cancer was a fool and a complete fraud. This first class fraud has set back Clinuvels photo protective skin tanning drug a good decade and helped significantly the toxic suncream industry continue to thrive and further perpetrate this outdated deadly lie for profit.

The truth will be revealed one day soon won’t it PW??

2020. Year of the germ!
 
Dr Wally
post Posted: Mar 22 2021, 09:20 PM
  Quote Post


Posts: 746
Thanks: 782




Hear hear I say to the hysteria, outdated beliefs, sudo science and utter BS that has no doubt kept Scenesses progress eternally “glacial” and the untested beyond suspect toxic suncream industry thriving.

Here’s but one example!!

And from a reputable source. The tide in this wacky space is slowly changing for the better.

https://hospitalhealthcare.com/clinical/exp...-really-a-link/

Expert view: Sunbed use and melanoma – is there really a link?

“Research UK, it states that “using sunbeds can increase your risk of melanoma skin cancer by 16-20%”.1 “

In support of this statement, a meta-analysis of observational studies in 2014 of those with melanoma who had used indoor tanning beds (sun beds), found that the odds ratio for melanoma associated with “ever use” of sunbeds was 1.16.2 In other words, there was a 16% increase in the odds of getting a melanoma with sunbed use compared to not using a sunbed.



***However, the authors conceded that the quality of the evidence contributing to their analysis ranged from poor to mediocre and the acknowledged a recognised limitation of observational studies, namely recall bias. ***



In contrast, a meta-analysis of observational studies in 2018 was less circumspect and concluded that scientific knowledge [on the link between indoor tanning and melanoma] is mainly based on poor quality data and that there is currently no convincing evidence that moderate/responsible use of solarium (indoor tanning) increases melanoma risk.3




--------------------
Whomever said that sunburn WASNT linked directly to the formation of skin cancer was a fool and a complete fraud. This first class fraud has set back Clinuvels photo protective skin tanning drug a good decade and helped significantly the toxic suncream industry continue to thrive and further perpetrate this outdated deadly lie for profit.

The truth will be revealed one day soon won’t it PW??

2020. Year of the germ!
 
Sherlock1123
post Posted: Mar 22 2021, 06:04 PM
  Quote Post


Posts: 48
Thanks: 52


In Reply To: investek's post @ Mar 20 2021, 03:40 PM

Hear hear!


Said 'Thanks' for this post: waz  
 
 


5138 Pages (Click to Jump) V  < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > » 

Back To Top Of Page
Reply to this topic


You agree through the use of ShareCafe, that you understand and accept the TERMS OF USE.


TERMS OF USE  -  CONTACT ADMIN  -  ADVERTISING