Jump to content

Short selling


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 149
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes unexpected considering this was in the paper earlier!!

New rules soon on short-selling disclosure Ruth Williams May 25, 2009

LONG-AWAITED rules governing how short-selling trades will be disclosed in Australia are "all but finished" and will be released within the next few weeks, according to the Minister for Corporate Law, Senator Nick Sherry.

Meanwhile the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is weighing up whether to lift an eight-month ban on short-selling of financial stocks. The prohibition is due to expire at the end of this week.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it seems like they let the cat amongst the pigeons today - all financials are down. But look out when it is short covering time, then it will be a switch from the resources into the financials and then we will have the reverse....................
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

They will find a way around it as always - it is called human ingenuity (or a better word GREED, greed is good) ......................


Jul 27, 2009, 5:25 p.m. EST



SEC makes permanent its rule to rein in short selling


But lawmakers say the measure doesn't effectively limit the practice

By Ronald D. Orol & Alistair Barr, MarketWatch WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- The Securities and Exchange Commission on Monday made permanent a temporary commission rule seeking to rein in "naked shorting," but some lawmakers argued the regulation is weak and they proposed an alternative approach.










Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

In the depths of the financial crisis a year ago, short sellers were blamed for driving some of the world's biggest financial institutions to the brink of ruin. Regulators around the globe responded with emergency bans on selling those stocks short.

Those bans have nearly all disappeared. It isn't much harder now to bet against companies than it was before the crisis. The prohibitions didn't stop stocks from tumbling and some say hampered trading.

The legacy of the crisis may turn out to be rules that address longstanding controversies with short selling and attempt to prevent selling frenzies like those that occurred last fall. Still, critics of short selling, including some in Congress, haven't stopped their calls for tighter rules, even though there is little evidence these restrictions are effective.

Calling last year's ban a "disaster" for the smooth functioning of the stock market, Charles Jones, a finance professor at Columbia University, says the SEC has "moved toward a 'sand in the gears' approach of just slowing" the short sellers, he says.

It is a similar story around the globe. In the United Kingdom, Australia, France and Germany, the focus is either on increased disclosure of short positions or prohibitions on "naked" short selling -- selling the stock without having the borrowed shares to deliver to the buyer, something already outlawed in the U.S. and the subject of stricter SEC regulations.

"The real story is that a much more stringent rule set on borrowing [stocks] has been made," says Brian Fagen, a managing director in the equities division at Barclays Capital.

Last October, the SEC adopted a temporary rule -- made permanent this summer -- that bars a brokerage firm from shorting a stock for itself or another account if its client fails to deliver that stock within the time limits set by SEC rules.

At the time the rule was adopted last fall, such failures to deliver were rampant in the market, fueling criticism that short sellers were flouting the rules and ganging up on stocks to drive them down and make big profits. In the first nine months of 2008, the number of stocks with large numbers of shares that hadn't been delivered to investors for an extended period never sank below 407 issues and rose as high as 702, according to Wall Street Journal research. Over the past six months, the number of stocks on the "threshold securities" lists of major exchanges has dropped to an average of just 74 each day.

Daily figures for shares that aren't delivered within the required three-day settlement period show a similar trend. In the 12 months through September 2008, 14 of every 100 shares traded weren't delivered on time. Since then, the rate of delivery failures is down to an average of four shares per hundred.

Such a targeted approach is far from what happened a year ago. U.K. regulators acted first after the collapse of Lehman Brothers, banning new short selling of financial stocks on Sept. 18, 2008. The SEC followed quickly with its own ban on what would eventually total nearly 1,000 stocks -- roughly one-fifth of listed U.S. stocks. The SEC ban lasted until Oct 8.

In the less than three weeks the ban was in place, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 16%.

Later, a study by the agency's Office of Economic Analysis concluded that it was "long sellers" -- investors who had bought stocks thinking they would go up -- who were selling the most during stock declines. Short sellers, the study said, became more active when stocks rose sharply.

Credit Suisse found the ban made stock pricing less efficient, which in turn can make buying or selling a stock more costly for investors. The firm's data showed the difference between prices at which banned stocks could be bought and sold, the bid and asked prices, doubled during the ban. After the ban was lifted and short selling slowly resumed, spreads fell back to about 65% above preprohibition levels the third week of October.

Traders expect regulators outside the U.S. to take their cues from the SEC. But if the markets become volatile again, some say they would act on their own. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission warned that it "would not hesitate to reimpose the ban immediately" if it felt short-selling could potentially harm Australia's financial system.

The SEC is still considering a significant change, involving a new version of the "uptick" rule, which essentially allowed short sales only at a price higher than the previous trade -- a rule deemed outdated and eliminated in 2007. During the crisis, the lack of an uptick rule was cited by many as enabling short sellers to drive stock prices lower.

Under consideration is a proposal barring short sellers from initiating a trade, on the theory that would make it harder to continuously sell a stock at lower and lower prices. Instead, the short sellers could only sell their borrowed shares when another investor places a buy order. Investors who already owned a stock and wanted to sell would face no restrictions on selling.

The SEC is seeking comments on its proposals, including whether new rules should be in place all the time or triggered when a stock posts a big decline, such as a 10% drop.

Dan Mathisson, a managing director at Credit Suisse, argues that the experience of last year's ban shows that limiting short selling hampers the broader market. But if a rule is implemented it should be with a trigger, he says. "Without the circuit breakers it's a bit ridiculous. Why slow down shorting on stocks that are shooting up?"

Columbia University's Mr. Jones notes the vitriol aimed at short sellers has faded a year after the crisis. "When stock prices are tanking, people hate short-sellers," he says. "Right now stock prices have been rising, so you don't hear as much about the 'evil' short sellers."




Link to comment
Share on other sites

veeone, thanks a great article on short selling! Some of the remedies mentioned towards the end are very interesting and I hope are adopted eg reinstatement of the up tick and shorters not being able to initiate trades. At one point to article quotes a few people to say that generally shorters make the market more efficient, while this may be true when shorters 'target' a stock by naked short selling the loss of confidence in the overall market is against the overall market purpose and efficency.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Investors 'should own-up on short positions

From: AAP Fri Oct 02 13:29:00 EST 2009




INVESTORS would have to report their short positions to the corporate watchdog from April 1 next year under new draft rules proposed by the Federal Government.


The draft regulations were released on Friday by Financial Services Minister Chris Bowen after public consultations with key stakeholders.


"The regulations strike the right balance between the markets interest in knowing what short selling is occurring and the legitimate interests of businesses in not having their trading strategies compromised," Mr Bowen said.


They require the reporting of "covered short selling" transactions to market operators, such as the Australian Securities Exchange, that would be publicly released the following business day.


They would also require short positions to be reported by short sellers to the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) from April 1, 2010.


This information will be released by ASIC to the public four business days after the positions are taken.


"This disclosure timetable was finalised following close consultation with the corporate regulator and industry, and was determined to be the most liberal approach that was consistent with maintaining market integrity," Mr Bowen said.


A covered short position is where an investor sells shares borrowed from another party in anticipation of the price falling, and then buys the stock back at cheaper price - pocketing the difference.


"Naked" short selling - selling shares the investor doesn't have in their possession - is banned.


The practice of short selling came to the fore last year when share markets went into near freefall in the heat of the global financial crisis.


The Government will review these regulatory arrangements 12 months after the commencement of the new positional reporting requirements.


"The regulations will finalise the government's enhancement of the regulatory regime governing short selling, which also included banning naked short selling and providing ASIC with enhanced powers in relation to short selling activity," Mr Bowen said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

moosey. thanks a lot of people have forgotten about short selling and it is no longer the flavour of the month which is a pity. I note the article says naked short selliing is to be banned which I think is good. Although doesn't the reporting of covered shorts get done now? I am unsure if this is a change? I look up short positions for my holdings at https://www.asxonline.com/intradoc-cgi/idcp...;SortOrder=Desc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Create New...