brett68 Posted August 10, 2008 Share Posted August 10, 2008 In reply to: brett68 on Friday 28/03/08 08:14am http://business.smh.com.au/business/counti...ge#contentSwap1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daggie Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 In reply to: brett68 on Monday 11/08/08 09:19am Is Mincor mining nickel laterite or sulphide? I can't find any info atm. Thanks for a reply. http://www.sharescene.com/html/emoticons/unsure.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krumbs Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 In reply to: daggie on Monday 11/08/08 11:35am MCR. Sulphides. www.mincor.com.au Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
328jet Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 Some of the sulphide producers are looking pretty attractive at these levels in my view, so starting to do a bit of homework for the watchlist The laterite miners with their higher capex & opex should provide a decent buffer for the sulphide producers. Can't see anyone planning a new HPAL at these sort of Ni prices.... MCR, PAN, ALB & IGO are down 70-80% over the last year! This report makes a good list of the sulphide miners http://www.minesite.com/fileadmin/content/...ners_210708.pdf Just having an initial look, MCR & PAN have about $100M in cash each & market caps not much over $200m MBN also has a very good deposit, but not in production for another year Any preferences in terms of the sulphide miners? http://www.sharescene.com/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macduffy Posted October 7, 2008 Share Posted October 7, 2008 In reply to: 328jet on Tuesday 07/10/08 05:57pm Hi 328. That report was worth reading. Interesting to see MCR included in the possible takeover targets. I'd always assumed that because their production is contracted to BHP, no-one else would be interested in them and that it wasn't "necessary" for BHP to secure the metal via takeover. Thinking through it, though, I guess MCR becomes attractive to a number of companies, if it becomes cheap enough. I'm holding MCR and PAN and have been tempted to add some more, recently. I'm put off by the price of Ni, the world economic situation and the bear market generally. I'm still tempted but don't see any hurry to buy unless/until we see signs of corporate activity. http://www.sharescene.com/html/emoticons/cool.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twobees Posted October 15, 2008 Share Posted October 15, 2008 In reply to: macduffy on Wednesday 08/10/08 05:51am Am watching Ni with the hope of catching the next uptrend, whenever that might be. This could happen if the current recession doesn't pan out as bad as anticipated and China etc continue to power along at a decent pace. This would lift all boats, i.e both the laterite and sulphide producers you would imagine. However WSA would be my pick. What are other investors looking at to try and pick the upturn should it occur? LME stocks? They look pretty healthy now from an historical perspective. cheers 2bs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ead83 Posted October 16, 2008 Share Posted October 16, 2008 QUOTE (Twobees @ Wednesday 15/10/08 12:01pm) Hi Twobees, WSA looks like a great pick, especially considering the weakness of the Aussie dollar and their monster grades. I'm sticking to the sulphide producers with low cash costs and high grade deposits. A few off the top of my head are MCR, IGO & PAN. ALB looks especially underpriced to my eyes, but operates in a higher risk environment (producing in Zambia); they seem to have a good mix of production and exploration and are in JV with BHP in Tanzania. They've got very little debt having now closed out their hedgebook, and are still making money over fist with cash costs of $2.50/lb. I reckon we might see nickel stabilise around the $5/lb mark, which will probably make a few laterite deposits uneconomical to produce; I wouldn't expect a bounce until we start seeing the nickel stock beginning to fall a little from its recent highs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
denpal Posted October 16, 2008 Share Posted October 16, 2008 In reply to: ead83 on Thursday 16/10/08 04:57pm ALB: I wonder whether they are more exposed to $USD based costs than a Australian based producer. Giving their hedging and their extremely good project delivery to date, low cash costs (and good by-product credits) I still like ALB although don't hold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jojosydney Posted October 16, 2008 Share Posted October 16, 2008 In reply to: denpal on Thursday 16/10/08 05:22pm Hi denpal, Imho the best pick for Nickel would be WSA who can produce Ni at a cost around the US$1.50/lb and remember WSA in australia with low political risk attached. Also its a fast growing company with heaps of cash in the bank and will be producing 30000 tonnes by 2010 I think it was. So do your own research but if you do believe in Ni coming back then WSA is a no brainer. They even talk about paying their first dividend early next year with the current low Ni prices and that should give you enough evidence that we are not talking about a loss making Ni producer. Good luck jojo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
macduffy Posted October 16, 2008 Share Posted October 16, 2008 I've just had a look at a chart comparing the SP's of WSA, MCR and PAN for the last 12 months. On a percentage basis WSA is down 20% but the established, profitable nickel miners MCR and PAN are down around 75%! I hold both MCR and PAN but they still look like the best Ni buys to me! http://www.sharescene.com/html/emoticons/cool.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now