Jump to content

Aged Care Services


scotchnice

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

always liked LIC - they have held up, recently. Although the business model is built on sales (locate, develop, market, sell) the tailwinds are still there

ÃÆâ€â„¢ÃƒÆ’ƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¢ÃƒÆ’¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…¡Ãƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¬ÃƒÆ’â€Å¡Ãƒƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¢ Approximately one in three new home sales come from referrals

ÃÆâ€â„¢ÃƒÆ’ƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¢ÃƒÆ’¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…¡Ãƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¬ÃƒÆ’â€Å¡Ãƒƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¢ Pre-sales on new communities are increasing

ÃÆâ€â„¢ÃƒÆ’ƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¢ÃƒÆ’¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…¡Ãƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¬ÃƒÆ’â€Å¡Ãƒƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¢ We have wait lists on all existing communities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
Aura Australia, a joint venture between former RetireAustralia executives and Blue Sky Alternative Investments (BLA), is planning a $67 million retirement village at Maroochydore on the Sunshine Coast. On almost one hectare, acquired for $6 million, the joint venture will develop a vertical retirement village of about four storeys.

 

"People are downsizing from houses to apartments," Blue Sky Private Real Estate director Stuart Lockhart told The Australian Financial Review. "A lot of people who haven't lived in apartments before like the ability to just walk down the hallway, take the lift and arrive at the communal facilities. They like the ease of access."

 

It is the second project between listed private equity investor Blue Sky and the former RetireAustralia people, including its founder Tim Russell.

 

Blue Sky, which acquired 50 per cent of Aura in September, will develop the latest project through its Private Real Estate arm. Aura will manage it.

 

It is expected the 116-unit Maroochydore development, at the former site of the Swan Bowls Club on Anzac Avenue, will be finished by the end of 2019. The Aura village will take shape opposite the St Vincent's Care Services Maroochydore, a new aged-care facility set to open in January 2017.

 

"This is the future of Australian retirement: safe, secure, vibrant communities that are close to essential services, friends and family," Mr Russell said.

 

Mr Lockhart said investment in retirement villages was not keeping up with the ageing population. Australians over 65 are forecast to comprise 20 per cent of the population by 2050.

 

"Queensland is a popular retirement choice, and currently has around 28,000 independent living units. "A conservative estimate is that by 2050, we will need more than four times the current supply."

AFR
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Crunch time for aged-care payments

A key change is happening inside the aged-care sector: simply, more and more people are tiring of ÃÆâ€â„¢ÃƒÆ’ƒÂ¢Ãƒ¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…¡ÃƒÆ’â€Å¡Ãƒƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚­offering interest-free loans to aged-care companies. Instead, they are opting for a new payment mechanism that just might help them keep the family home.

 

Here's how it works. If entering a retirement home, then after being assessed by the government on your assets and income, you may have to pay a fee for nursing home accommodation costs.

 

Since 2014, new residents have the choice to either pay an ongoing rental style fee called a ''daily accommodation payment'' or otherwise opt to make a one-off lump-sum payment called a ''refundable accommodation deposit'', also known as ''the RAD''.

 

Before July 1, 2014, the aged-care provider had more control in being able to dictate terms on accommodation payments. Flexibility with the new rules potentially allow residents to keep the family home when moving into aged care as they are not forced to pay a lump-sum amount for accommodation as they were in the past.

 

If they opt for the ongoing accommodation payment to the aged-care provider, the resident could look to rent out the family home,which would generate income to help cover the nursing home fees.

 

We recently had a very good insight into the area from the results of ASX-listed aged-care provider Estia Health: Estia's management under new CEO Norah Barlow suggests an average stay for a resident in one of its facilities is 2.3 years and that the average RAD charged is $377,000. Estia reported that over the six months from July to December 2016, the number of residents who paid RADs fell from 2256 to 1860 while the number of rental style payments increased from 514 residents to 690.

 

This indicates more people are opting to pay an ongoing accommodation fee rather than have a large lump-sum locked up by the aged-care provider at zero per cent interest. The implications are that aged-care providers will need to manage cash flow carefully moving forward so that they can meet the increasing number of residents shifting over to the rental style payment from the RAD.

 

It is a common misconception that the lump sum provided to the aged-care provider is set aside and wholly invested before being repaid upon the resident's exit. In reality, the lump-sum payment is absorbed by the aged-care provider and used for general operations and to fund construction of new places...........

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/w...886d992c51cb671

 

"consolidated revenue" = black hole

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The payment of interest on the unpaid RAD rather than paying the RAD lump sum does not work well in our experience.

 

 

Given the interest rate is (was?) over 6% and the pensioner bank accounts were paying about 3% (less now I think) a resident is going out backwards at greater rate if he/she invests safely rather paying the RAD up front.

 

Keeping the cash in the bank is then considered an asset and fees go up and pension goes down (if on one)

 

If anyone or anyone's parents are looking to go into care in the near future, do your research, get pro advice, as the govt departments are $#@! hopelessly inept and as a rule do not understand their own rules.

 

It is a minefield and little mistakes can cost a lot of money. Find a way to legally hide your money, spend it or give it away > 5years out from entering care or pension age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

too true, balance; unfortunately, too true in the points you raise. the complexity, and having to make an 'informed decision' at a point in time, when uncertainties abound, makes for confusion, and then some. Contact points and the 'expertise' of those in call centres is an added joke, of the worst kind.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Bupa has called on the Turnbull government to overhaul aged-care funding and introduce a market-driven system that will see Australians financially contribute to their care.

 

The company, in its submission to a Senate inquiry into the sector, said it recognised that in the current budgetary environment, it was not realistic to expect the government to increase funding to the industry.

 

ÃÆâ€â„¢ÃƒÆ’ƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¢ÃƒÆ’¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…¡Ãƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¬ÃƒÆ’â€Â¦ÃƒƒÂ¢Ãƒ¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…âہ“We therefore believe the Productivity CommissionÃÆâ€â„¢ÃƒÆ’ƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¢ÃƒÆ’¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…¡Ãƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¬ÃƒÆ’¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…¾Ãƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¢s recommendation to move to market-driven aged-care funding, where people who can afford it contribute to the cost of their personal care, while those who cannot afford it continue to be heavily subsidised, should be seriously considered as part of a much-needed national conversation on ageing and aged care,ÃÆâ€â„¢ÃƒÆ’ƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¢ÃƒÆ’¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…¡Ãƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¬ÃƒÆ’â€Å¡Ãƒƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚ the company said.

 

ÃÆâ€â„¢ÃƒÆ’ƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¢ÃƒÆ’¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…¡Ãƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¬ÃƒÆ’â€Â¦ÃƒƒÂ¢Ãƒ¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…âہ“While we acknowledge it is often not a simple process to reform funding, Australians expect and deserve high-quality aged care ... and urgent funding reform is required if we want to ensure Australians can continue to access high-quality aged care.ÃÆâ€â„¢ÃƒÆ’ƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¢ÃƒÆ’¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…¡Ãƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¬ÃƒÆ’â€Å¡Ãƒƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚ÂÂ

 

The submission highlighted that Council of The Ageing (COTA) research had found that consumers did not mind being asked to pay more if they could afford it, but they wanted more choice and a better-quality system.

 

Bupa warned that recent changes to residential aged-care funding, particularly to the aged-care funding instrument, were threatening the sustainability of the sector and its capacity to provide high-quality care to residents, including those with complex care needs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
a look at recently ÃÆâ€â„¢ÃƒÆ’ƒÂ¢Ãƒ¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…¡ÃƒÆ’â€Å¡Ãƒƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚­announced annual results makes for interesting reading.

 

JaparaÃÆâ€â„¢ÃƒÆ’ƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¢ÃƒÆ’¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…¡Ãƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¬ÃƒÆ’¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…¾Ãƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¢s EBITDA rose 7 per cent to $60 million but its dividend reduced from 11.5c per share to 11.2c per share, with franking down to 84 per cent from 100 per cent.

 

At Regis profits rose 18 per cent but management guided that earnings would be flat in the year ahead.

 

Estia reported EBITDA of $86.5m, down from $92.7m last year, despite revenue growing 18 per cent: Total dividends fell from 25.6c a share in 2016 to 8c a share in 2017.

 

Japara and Regis are sitting on large debts, with debt-to-equity ratios of 96 per cent and 138 per cent respectively. When borrowing costs rise, there will almost certainly be a hit to profit.

 

There are five other reasons why listed aged-care operators are struggling:

 

1. Reduced government funding

 

At the midyear economic and fiscal outlook (MYEFO) in November 2015 the government announced that some aged-care providers were taking advantage of the low-care/high-care funding disparity, and putting too many people into high care to attract the higher government funding. It announced that a review of funding arrangements would save it more than $1 billion. These changes were ratified in the following yearÃÆâ€â„¢ÃƒÆ’ƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¢ÃƒÆ’¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…¡Ãƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¬ÃƒÆ’¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…¾Ãƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¢s budget.

 

2. Rising costs

 

The cost of running a bed in an aged-care centre is typically about $200 a day. In order to make a profit, operators must charge significantly more than that. Things are tougher when they are operating at less than 100 per cent capacity. The major component of their revenue is locked in via government funding. The rest they must make up via the extra serÃÆâ€â„¢ÃƒÆ’ƒÂ¢Ãƒ¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…¡ÃƒÆ’â€Å¡Ãƒƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚­vices fee and the daily accommodation payment (the interest payment on any unpaid RAD, formerly known as the bond).

 

3. Staff wages

 

As ever, running an aged-care centre is a balancing act. Too many staff affect profits, too few staff and standards of care drop and people leave. Staff are generally on enterprise bargaining agreements, so their wages are locked in.

 

4. Pressure on fees

 

The costs of aged care ÃÆâ€â„¢ÃƒÆ’ƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¢ÃƒÆ’¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…¡Ãƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¬ÃƒÆ’¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚¬Ãƒâ€¦Ã‚¡ÃƒÆ’‚¬Ãƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚ particularly the initial cost of entering aged-care bed (the RAD/bond) ÃÆâ€â„¢ÃƒÆ’ƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¢ÃƒÆ’¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…¡Ãƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¬ÃƒÆ’¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚¬Ãƒâ€¦Ã‚¡ÃƒÆ’‚¬Ãƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚ are a function of supply and ÃÆâ€â„¢ÃƒÆ’ƒÂ¢Ãƒ¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…¡ÃƒÆ’â€Å¡Ãƒƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚­demand. There are more than 2800 aged-care centres in Australia, and many of them have empty beds, so there is plenty of choice. If there are empty beds, there is significant pressure on operators to offer deals on RADs and extra services fees. The level of government funding also encourages operators to offer concessional beds to people with low means.

 

5. Competition from NFPs

 

Listed aged-care providers have plenty of competition from not-for-profit aged-care providers, which do not have the same pressure to make a return on investment. In addition, not-for-profit organisations can offer staff benefits that their for-profit counterparts cannot match, such as exemptions on Fringe Benefits Tax. This makes it harder for the listed companies to attract staff.

 

The aged-care sector is going through an expensive growth phase. The companies are increasingly struggling to cover their costs with sufficient margins to attract the interest of investors.

 

The market has brought the shares of aged-care providers back to about 15-16 times earnings, which is where they will remain until they can convince investors that large-scale growth is likely.

John Rawling is an aged-care consultant at Joseph Palmer & Sons
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Listed aged care sectorÃÆâ€â„¢ÃƒÆ’ƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¢ÃƒÆ’¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…¡Ãƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¬ÃƒÆ’¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…¾Ãƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¢s treatment of debt in question

If you look back at the history of failed property companies, they have one thing in common: high debt levels combined with insufficient cash flow. Typically they will rely on capital markets to fund their operations, and when those markets close, the music stops. This happened in 2007 for the REIT sector and the poor capital management was exposed.

 

Understandably, with interest rates beginning to rise globally, investors are now starting to get nervous. However, when we look across the sector we do see vastly improved capital management in recent years.

 

One sector that stands out for complex financial reporting is aged care. There are concerns that companies are potentially understating debt and overstating their cash flows.

 

This phenomenon comes about through what is referred to as refundable accommodation deposits. The RADs are a lump-sum payment paid upfront for entry into an aged care facility.

 

They can be used for multiple purposes and sit on the balance sheet as a liability, but not as pure debt. As a result they can be used as a third source of funding (alongside equity and debt) and can effectively be used to increase a companyÃÆâ€â„¢ÃƒÆ’ƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¢ÃƒÆ’¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…¡Ãƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¬ÃƒÆ’¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…¾Ãƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¢s return on equity. The listed players (Estia, Japara and Regis) have historically used these funds plus debt to make acquisitions, adding more RADs and hence more funding to the balance sheet. In addition some of the listed players include the change in RADs in operating cashflow, which potentially overstates the cash they are earning.

 

If we take Estia for example, we find its debt level is $121m against $1.79bn of total assets. At first glance it appears there is nothing to be worried about (a gearing ratio of 6.7 per cent), but if we delve deeper we discover some cracks. Of the $1.79bn of assets we find just over $1bn are intangible, predominantly goodwill from acquisitions. In addition the RADs on the balance sheet are $730m; if we were to include these as debt (they do have to be repaid and the holder does receive government-mandated interest), the company has negative net tangible assets.

 

The problem comes about if the proportion of residents who pay via RADs starts to fall. If this proportion falls, these companies will experience potentially negative cash flow in what is effectively a forced reduction in debt. A large reversal in resident behaviour would cause tremendous strain. The three major players are all recent listings that came to market riding changes in legislation (the Living Longer Living Better reforms) and a thematic that investors were excited by (an ageing population). However, at the heart of these companies are low-returning assets juiced up by financial engineering. I donÃÆâ€â„¢ÃƒÆ’ƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¢ÃƒÆ’¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…¡Ãƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¬ÃƒÆ’¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…¾Ãƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¢t believe the sector has been fully tested as yet and worry about what happens when it is.

Guy Carson is the head of Australian value strategies at TAMIM Asset Management

 

- I'll go along with that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...
The narrative is along these lines:
If the painful de-rating of our largest financial institution is anything to go by, investors should be wary of our listed aged care sector after the federal government announced on Sunday that it was launching a Royal Commission looking into bad practices in the sector. This could be worse than the Banking Royal Commission. Age care is arguably a more emotive subject and thereÃÆâ€â„¢ÃƒÆ’ƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¢ÃƒÆ’¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…¡Ãƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¬ÃƒÆ’¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢Ã¢â€š¬Ã…¡Ãƒâ€šÃ‚¬ÃƒÆ’…¾Ãƒâہ¡ÃƒÆ’‚¢s already plenty of circumstantial evidence pointing to the need for major regulatory reforms that are likely to squeeze the profit margins of our listed players....
- everyone has a story !.. usually about grandma
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...